Skip to main content

Design and Fabrication of a Floating Social Robot: CeB the Social Blimp

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Robotics (ICSR 2021)

Abstract

Robotic blimps have a wide range of applications, such as monitoring activities in their surroundings, advertising, and performing on stages. They also have remarkable capacities to be used as a social robot. In this research, a manually operated social robotic blimp has been developed intending to interact with children as a social agent and attract adults’ attention as an entertainer in indoor public environments. Since the appearance of a social robot has a significant impact on its acceptance, first, we acquired opinions of several participants on the shape of a desired floating robot. The results revealed that a simple spherical structure adequately draws people’s attention. After design and fabrication of the robot, a survey on its social behaviors was distributed among 82 people. The results indicated that the participants prefer a medium-sized robot, and they also feel almost safe when the robot works around them. Furthermore, the results showed that people genuinely appreciate the opportunity to have a mutual conversation with the designed social blimp. Moreover, the participants believed that the designed blimp could be an entertaining social flying robot with which it is easy to interact. The outcome of this survey will be beneficial in designing and developing a social blimp with a focus on interacting with children and entertaining people.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Basiri, S., Taheri, A., Meghdari, A., Alemi, M.: Design and implementation of a robotic architecture for adaptive teaching: a case study on iranian sign language. J. Intell. Rob. Syst. 102(2), 1–19 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-021-01413-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Taheri, A., Shariati, A., Heidari, R., Shahab, M., Alemi, M., Meghdari, A.: Impacts of using a social robot to teach music to children with low-functioning autism. Paladyn J. Behav. Robot. 12(1), 256–275 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zibafar, A., et al.: State-of-the-art visual merchandising using a fashionable social robot: Roma. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 13(3), 509–523 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Niemelä, M., Heikkilä, P., Lammi, H., Oksman, V.: A social robot in a shopping mall: studies on acceptance and stakeholder expectations. In: Korn, O. (ed.) Social Robots: Technological, Societal and Ethical Aspects of Human-Robot Interaction. HIS, pp. 119–144. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17107-0_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, H., Park, H.W., Breazeal, C.: Teaching and learning with children: impact of reciprocal peer learning with a social robot on children’s learning and emotive engagement. Comput. Educ. 150, 103836 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ranjkar, E., Rafatnejad, R., Nobaveh, A.A., Meghdari, A., Alemi, M.: Design, fabrication, and evaluation of the “Maya” social robot. In: 2019 7th International Conference on Robotics and Mechatronics (ICRoM), pp. 52–62. IEEE, November 2019

    Google Scholar 

  7. Meghdari, A., et al.: Arash: a social robot buddy to support children with cancer in a hospital environment. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. [H] J. Eng. Med. 232(6), 605–618 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nemati, A., Zhao, D., Jiang, W., Ge, S.S.: Companion transporter: a co-worker in the greenhouse. In: Salichs, M.A., et al. (eds.) ICSR 2019. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11876, pp. 322–331. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35888-4_30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Berk, J., Mitter, N.: Autonomous light air vessels (ALAVs). In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 1029–1030, October 2006

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nowacka, D., Hammerla, N.Y., Elsden, C., Plötz, T., Kirk, D.: Diri-the actuated helium balloon: a study of autonomous behaviour in interfaces. In: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, pp. 349–360, September 2015

    Google Scholar 

  11. Carrillo, L.R.G., López, A.E.D., Lozano, R., Pégard, C.: Quad Rotorcraft Control: Vision-Based Hovering and Navigation, pp. 10–12. Springer Science & Business Media (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dahms, J., Bardenhagen, A.: Propulsion model for (hybrid) unmanned aircraft systems (UAS). Aircr. Eng. Aerosp. Technol. 91(2), 373–380 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/AEAT-01-2018-0033

  13. Tobita, H.: Cloud interface: designing aerial computer environment for novel user interface. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology, pp. 1–8, November 2011

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tobita, H., Maruyama, S., Kuzi, T.: Floating avatar: telepresence system using blimps for communication and entertainment. In: CHI’11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 541–550 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Paulos, E., Canny, J.: PRoP: personal roving presence. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 296–303, January 1998

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yamada, W., Manabe, H., Ikeda, D.: Zerone: safety drone with blade-free propulsion. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–8, May 2019

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sadasivan, N.: Design and realization of an unmanned aerial rotorcraft vehicle using pressurized inflatable structure. Int. J. Aviat. Aeronaut. Aerosp. 6(4), 3 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Srisamosorn, V., Kuwahara, N., Yamashita, A., Ogata, T., Ota, J.: Design of face tracking system using environmental cameras and flying robot for evaluation of health care. In: Duffy, V.G.G. (ed.) DHM 2016. LNCS, vol. 9745, pp. 264–273. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40247-5_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Veronese, F., Bulgarelli, D., Besio, S., Bianquin, N., Bonarini, A.: Off-the-shelf, robotic toys and physically impaired children: an analysis and suggested improvements. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-Exclusion, pp. 232–239, December 2016

    Google Scholar 

  20. Salem, M., Lakatos, G., Amirabdollahian, F., Dautenhahn, K.: Towards safe and trustworthy social robots: ethical challenges and practical issues. In: Tapus, A., André, E., Martin, J.C., Ferland, F., Ammi, M. (eds.) Social Robotics. ICSR 2015, LNCS, vol. 9388, pp. 584–593. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_58

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Taheri, A., Meghdari, A., Mahoor, M.H.: A close look at the imitation performance of children with autism and typically developing children using a robotic system. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 13(5), 1125–1147 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pour, A.G., Taheri, A., Alemi, M., Meghdari, A.: Human–robot facial expression reciprocal interaction platform: case studies on children with autism. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 10(2), 179–198 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lytridis, C., et al.: Social robots as cyber-physical actors in entertainment and education. In: 2019 International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM), pp. 1–6. IEEE. September 2019

    Google Scholar 

  24. Barakova, E.I., De Haas, M., Kuijpers, W., Irigoyen, N., Betancourt, A.: Socially grounded game strategy enhances bonding and perceived smartness of a humanoid robot. Connect. Sci. 30(1), 81–98 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Basiri, S., Taheri, A., Meghdari, A.F., Boroushaki, M., Alemi, M.: Dynamic Iranian Sign Language Recognition Using an Optimized Deep Neural Network: An Implementation via a Robotic-Based Architecture. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 1–21 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-021-00819-0

  26. Hosseini, S.R., Taheri, A., Alemi, M., Meghdari, A.: One-shot learning from demonstration approach toward a reciprocal sign language-based HRI. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 1–13 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-021-00818-1

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the fund provided by China National Key Research and Development Projects (Grant No. 2020YFB1313604).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Alireza Nemati or Ali F. Meghdari .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Etesami, E., Nemati, A., Meghdari, A.F., Ge, S.S., Taheri, A. (2021). Design and Fabrication of a Floating Social Robot: CeB the Social Blimp. In: Li, H., et al. Social Robotics. ICSR 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13086. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90525-5_58

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90525-5_58

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-90524-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-90525-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics